So there’s little privacy improvements with DoH without SNI being widely used. I would say most people are better off using their ISPs peer DNS as upstream since they usually have the better response time and your ISP is aware of your DNS foo anyway. Try a couple of setups and test responsetime with tools like namebench or dig
to ensure local dns resolution, leave the dns service on your router running and add a rule to adguard to forward these requests to the router (usually the device that runs your dhcp can resolve local hostnames) Example rule: Consider having your router use it’s regular peer DNS from your ISP but have your DHCP hand out your local adguard DNS servers to it’s clients. Namebench will run its suite of tests, which can take.
You point your router’s DNS back into your own network. As long as you won't get in trouble for doing it, I say go for it, switch between the ones you. Domain Name System (DNS) It may be hard to believe, but there are still a few people out there who haven’t visited your. Why does it take so long Let’s take a look at each step of the timeline and see how we can make it faster. There seems to be a design flaw with your setup which might be the cause of your issue: Six seconds can be an excruciatingly long time to wait for a single web page to load. It can result in better performance while producing more bloat. Enabling parrallel queries only makes sense if you define more than one upstream. However it shouldnt be recognizable by humans, only by numbers. even a 10mb pipe could seem slow when browsing the web if your dns server is taking too long to respond. No matter how fast your internet connection, you may be hitting a bottleneck in web browsing when it comes to your dns server.
Using a DoH upstream over regular DNS will be slower in most cases since theres a lot of overhead. 1.download namebench on mac yosemite 2.open app 3.start it 4.after, i wait for like 5 hour (from 15h to 21h) and it keep running initial health checks.